Rhetoric may soon be giving way to action when it comes to punishing China for its so-labeled trade wrongs.
Despite campaign promises to punish China until it got its trade relationship with the U.S. in line, President Trump and his administration have been treading fairly lightly with the Asian powerhouse as they sought aid in restraining North Korea’s nuclear program.
But now, according to reports from Axios, the president is considering taking action against China for something other than trade deficits: its theft of U.S. intellectual property.
The action, which would be a “self-initiating” trade case under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, would allow the president to impose duties on China for unfair trade practices. Section 301 hasn’t been widely tapped since the World Trade Organization took shape in 1995, but it used to be the way the U.S. handled trade battles before it had the WTO to step in.
If Trump does go that route—and an announcement about trade action could come as soon as this week—the Office of the United States Trade Representative would essentially have sole say in how things went considering the case was self-initiated. The move could see a case eventually end up in the WTO, and with that process, any proposed tariffs on China would likely be at least a year out.
And though the investigation into China’s potential intellectual property abuses itself might not incite a trade war, sweeping punitive tariffs might.
The U.S. and China met in Washington late last month to talk trade and those conversations ended with seemingly little conclusion.
[Read more about the China-U.S. trade talks: U.S.-China Trade Talks Conclude with Little Conclusion]
Reports naturally pointed to China’s trade deficit as the hang-up and all the Commerce Department had to say was that China acknowledged the U.S. position on those deficits and both sides would work to correct it.
President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping had what appeared to be an amiable meeting at Mar-a-Lago in April, but it seems Trump’s feelings may have since soured.
The president said on Twitter Saturday—defending the mode of communication as the only way for him to “get the truth out”—regarding China: “I am very disappointed in China. Our foolish past leaders have allowed them to make hundreds of billions of dollars a year in trade, yet…they do NOTHING for us with North Korea, just talk. We will no longer allow this to continue. China could easily solve this problem!”
Rumblings on the Hill have both addressed this potential trade action and implied that nothing is impending, but if it does move forward, it could pose a drastic change to U.S.-China trade relations.
Levi’s is reinventing its brand by combining its heritage with innovation to develop denim products consumers want.Read more
Whether it will die or not die seems to be the question when it comes to the North American Free Trade Agreement, and recent signs appear to be pointing more to the former than the latter.Read more
The Department of Labor has issued its first periodic review of progress in addressing issues identified in its January 2017 report on Colombia’s compliance with its obligations under the labor chapter of the U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement.Read more
Cordura teams with Triple Aught Design for Combat Wool sweaters, GlideWear technology to help avoid brain injuries, SKIIN introduces smart underwear and bras, and VF sets collaboration with NC State.Read more
Retail apparel prices fell 0.5% in December from a month earlier, the fourth consecutive monthly decline, while footwear prices also dipped, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in its monthly Consumer Price Index.Read more
Turkey is fortifying its sustainable stance with a new ecolabel certification system for various domestic products, including ceramics, paper and textiles.Read more
Holiday sales performance beat all expectations, with another spike in e-commerce, according to the U.S. Census Bureau and The National Retail Federation.Read more