The U.S. Trade Representative nominee said the U.S. must be more “imaginative” when dealing with trade issues related to China.
During his confirmation hearings on Tuesday Robert Lighthizer expressed his belief in President Trump’s America First agenda, which is designed to bring jobs back to the U.S. and boost the economy. Thus far, Trump’s plan has centered around reexamining trade agreements and possible tariffs on some foreign-made goods, especially those originating in China.
Asked about how he’d handle China, the former deputy U.S. Trade Representative said he thinks the U.S. needs to be more proactive and creative.
“I believe [the President] is going to change the paradigm on China and, if you look at our problems, China is right up there,” Lighthizer said.
Starting with the country’s handling of its currency, which Lighthizer, who headed up international trade at law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, said has historically been an issue.
“It is my judgement that China was a substantial currency manipulator, and I think we lost a lot of jobs because of it,” he said, while also noting that China isn’t the only culprit.
Ultimately though, Lighthizer said he’d leave it up to the treasury secretary to determine if the practice is still employed there.
Senators then asked what he would do with regards to China’s industrial policies, such as its over production in steel which U.S. firms claim depresses prices. To that, the nominee said the U.S. has to find ways to “encourage” Beijing to reduce capacity, which would include enforcing our trade laws and enlisting other countries to do the same. Ultimately, he said dealing with the problem will take “imaginative solutions” and a direct approach.
When asked how the World Trade Organization fits into Lighthizer’s arsenal, he said the trade body is one of many tools that could be employed.
“I don’t believe that the WTO is set up to deal with China and their industrial policy,” he said. “I just feel it was never really intended to deal with those kind of situations. So we have to use the tools we have and then I think we have to sit down with members and find a responsible way to deal with the problem by creating new tools.”
If millennials love sustainability and ethical companies so much, why aren’t they snapping up ethical brands like they're supposed to?Read more
Against the backdrop of the well documented challenges facing apparel retail in general and department stores specifically, Macy's, Kohl's and Neiman Marcus are all experiencing high-profile changes in the C-Suite.Read more
The British apparel retailer is the latest company to be prosecuted under the False Claims Act for skirting applicable customs duties.Read more
Walmart is rolling out new apparel brands across categories to shore up its position against Amazon as its sales in the sector continues to grow.Read more
Apparel companies historically have struggled with ethics and compliance, especially in sourcing and supply chain operations.Read more