Clothing companies’ revenues are highly dependent on deforestation commodities, causing a major sustainability conflict for the apparel industry.
According to a recent Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) report, “Revenue at risk: Why addressing deforestation is critical to business success,” 24 percent of retailers’ revenues rely on deforestation-linked commodities, like cattle products, palm oil products, soy products and timber products. The report indicated that up to $906 billion in annual turnover is in jeopardy, due to the apparel industry failing to clean up its carbon footprint.
“Supply chains are like rows of dominoes: if unsustainable commodities enter the top of a supply chain, the effects will cascade throughout,” CDP head of forests Katie McCoy said. “Failing to address deforestation will have knock-on reputational impacts, manifesting themselves as consumer boycotts, community opposition and increased regulatory scrutiny.”
Although most company incomes hail from deforestation commodities, only 42 percent of retailers have measured how the availability of these unsustainable materials will impact their future business growth. Many apparel companies have overlooked potential business risks connected to deforestation, including potential climate change alterations, tighter regulation and brand damage from consumer concerns over the lack of environmentally-friendly sourcing initiatives.
Despite potential business risks, 74 percent of companies said they were confident in securing commodities in coming years. The report demonstrated the opposite and indicated that retailers were not realistic about their souring practices. Only one-fifth of retailers measure future deforestation risks across commodities, 70 percent of retailers can’t trace their commodities in their supply chains and only 44 percent of retailers monitor compliance and audit suppliers across commodities.
To reduce dependency on deforestation commodities, the report suggests retailers foster transparency with suppliers, discuss deforestation among executive leaders and work with affiliates to brainstorm solutions.
Out of the 187 retailers evaluated, some clothing companies were recognized for their environmentally-friendly efforts. Marks & Spencer, achieved A’s across all four commodities and Inditex achieved an A for cattle product sustainability leadership. Other apparel tycoons that achieved good ratings included Coach (B- for cattle products and timber products) and Kering (A- for cattle products and B for timber products). Non-responding apparel retailers, including American Eagle Outfitters and Nordstrom, earned F’s for their deforestation reduction initiatives.
LevaData is tapping the power of AI to make strategic sourcing and procurement more seamless for apparel industry members.Read more
Samples, it seems, may soon end up on the endangered list if 3D modeling technology continues to improve and provides the industry with a way to cut down production timelines.Read more
Abercrombie & Fitch continues to rely on Hollister gains, while positioning the Abercrombie brand for similar success. Gap sales up on Athleta, Old Navy performance.Read more
The domestic textile industry and apparel importers have often been on opposite sides of U.S. trade issues, but in today’s political climate they seem to have found some common ground.Read more
U.S. employers added 261,000 jobs in October, pushing unemployment down to the lowest rate since the halcyon days of late 2000.Read more
While everyone’s been focused on the "retail apocalypse," the real story to emerge from 2017 might be the strange bedfellows that have emerged as everyone tries to plot a course forward. The recent partnership between Walmart and Lord & Taylor is the latest to get people talking.Read more
J.W. Anderson’s chief executive, Simon Whitehouse, is exiting the company, plus Dick's Sporting Goods tapped Paul Gaffney as its new CTO.Read more