Relations between the U.S. and Germany aren’t coming up roses this week.
Ahead of what became an awkward meeting between President Trump and German chancellor Angela Merkel Friday when Trump didn’t shake her hand, Germany’s economic minister said it could take up issue with the World Trade Organization regarding the U.S.-proposed border tax.
The border adjustment tax, now more familiarly known as the BAT tax, would lower the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, while at the same time changing the tax structure so that companies can no longer deduct the cost of imports from their taxable income. Essentially, any company selling imported product would be paying taxes on the full proceeds of the sale, rather than just on the profit.
Trump has already said the U.S. would impose a 35 percent border tax on the cars BMW makes at its Mexico plant for export to the U.S., and Germany’s response may not be an amiable one.
“The other option is that we file a suit against him at the WTO—there are procedures laid out there because in the WTO agreements it is clearly laid out that you’re not allowed to take more than 2.5% taxes on imports of cars,” German economy minister Brigitte Zypries told Deutschlandfunk radio, as reported by Reuters. “The Americans need our machines and our plants.”
Border adjustment has been the biggest hot button issue for trade this year, and reactions to the proposed tax have come out on both sides of the aisle.
In a new television ad launched by pro-BAT supporters, the angle was all about creating jobs.
“For years, lights have been turned out in American factories. Lights that won’t likely be turned on again. Because of old tax policies, our country has lost millions of American jobs. Stop favoring foreign-made imports over American-made goods. Support tax reform and create 1.7 million new American jobs,” the ad, sponsored by the American-Made Coalition, says.
In an article on “Why the Border Adjustment Tax Should be Killed,” Barron’s said the whole tax is simply too complicated—a notion Trump had agreed with in the past.
“The BAT would bring uncertainty and disruption to the U.S. economy, making it hard to predict whether it really would raise $100 billion annually in revenue. The basic idea is that, because the U.S. imports more than it exports, the export exemption would be more than offset by hitting imports hard,” according to Barron’s. “Regardless of how it shakes out, the value of the transaction affected by the BAT is huge.”
LevaData is tapping the power of AI to make strategic sourcing and procurement more seamless for apparel industry members.Read more
Samples, it seems, may soon end up on the endangered list if 3D modeling technology continues to improve and provides the industry with a way to cut down production timelines.Read more
Abercrombie & Fitch continues to rely on Hollister gains, while positioning the Abercrombie brand for similar success. Gap sales up on Athleta, Old Navy performance.Read more
The domestic textile industry and apparel importers have often been on opposite sides of U.S. trade issues, but in today’s political climate they seem to have found some common ground.Read more
U.S. employers added 261,000 jobs in October, pushing unemployment down to the lowest rate since the halcyon days of late 2000.Read more
While everyone’s been focused on the "retail apocalypse," the real story to emerge from 2017 might be the strange bedfellows that have emerged as everyone tries to plot a course forward. The recent partnership between Walmart and Lord & Taylor is the latest to get people talking.Read more
J.W. Anderson’s chief executive, Simon Whitehouse, is exiting the company, plus Dick's Sporting Goods tapped Paul Gaffney as its new CTO.Read more