China Will Bite Back on Trade Actions and the US Won’t Like It

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you ask China, the North Korea nuclear issue and U.S.-China trade relations have nothing to do with one another—or at least they shouldn’t.

News of potential trade action against China for its intellectual property infractions emerged from the Hill this week, and though nothing was concrete, talk had potential duties pegged as a possible punishment for China.

[Read more on the state of U.S.-China trade relations: Trump May be Poised to Take Aggressive Trade Action Against China]

Since then, China has warned the U.S. that actions like this would do little for either nation’s position.

“We both win through cooperation. We both are hurt in a fight,” China Commerce Ministry spokesperson Gao Feng said in a statement posted on the ministry’s website.

The goal, at least on China’s side, seems to be avoiding a trade war, but according to The Wall Street Journal, the country is prepared to target American businesses if Washington goes ahead with trade sanctions.

President Trump has voiced his displeasure with China and its inability both to improve its trade imbalance with the U.S. and rein in North Korea and its nuclear missile development. Trump had alluded to making trade concessions for China in exchange for its aid in dealing with North Korea, but that hasn’t panned out as the president hoped. As such, it seems Trump may want to initiate a case under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, which would essentially allow the Administration to take action against China for unfair trade practices and avoid the World Trade Organization, which has been the body to handle these matters since its inception.

Despite its public interest in keeping the peace, China’s retaliation could hit the U.S. wherever it hurts most, like agriculture or aircraft—industries where the U.S. has a considerable trade surplus.

“Usually China will not respond in the same industry sector,” William Zarit chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told The Wall Street Journal. “They may target industries and products that will cause equal pain.”


Recent News

Consumers Aren’t Out of Reach, Your Marketing is Just Out of Date

While traditional marketers might be losing sleep trying to figure out how to pin down today's distracted consumer, Adidas and Roots are using technology to develop new ways to capture shoppers’ attention.

This content is for Annual, Monthly and Limited members only. You can read up to five free articles each month with a Limited Level Subscription. Please log in, or register.
Log In Register
Read more

Report: Fewer Risks, More Rewards for Socially Responsible Apparel

A recent report by A.T. Kearney highlights the ways in which sustainability can lead to profitability, using apparel companies currently employing these tactics as case studies.

This content is for Annual, Monthly and Limited members only. You can read up to five free articles each month with a Limited Level Subscription. Please log in, or register.
Log In Register
Read more

Tommy Hilfiger on Innovation, Instant Gratification and Courting the Instagram Generation

Tommy Hilfiger credits his brand's staying power to tapping into the fountain of youth, whether that means teaming with Gigi Hadid or jumping on nascent AI technology.

This content is for Annual, Monthly and Limited members only. You can read up to five free articles each month with a Limited Level Subscription. Please log in, or register.
Log In Register
Read more