One of the most interesting things that happened this week was the launch of brandless.com, the well-funded startup that takes the “big brands are irrelevant” and “who needs traditional retailers to launch anything?” phenomena to their natural conclusion. In this post, the influential blog Well and Good states, in its typical breathless and “I’m your best girlfriend” fashion:
“The just-launched Brandless is like if [Japanese retailer] Muji and the dollar store had a wellness love child. Everything at the online grocery store is priced at just $3 (or less!). Seriously. That includes both health and superfood basics (like organic oats and honey granola), buzzier items like sea salt quinoa chips and organic agave nectar, and home and beauty essentials like EPA-certified dish soap and organic cotton rounds. (Plus you can outfit a kitchen in no time—with not that much moolah—with Brandless’ $3 plates, bowls, knives, and more.)”
The Well and Good article includes an interview with one of the Brandless founders, who said: “Consumers are forced to pay what we call the brand tax, and that brand tax is the unfair sort of inefficiency in the current system.”
Here’s a brief and very fun article that serves as a reminder of how brands were created until very, very recently.
Separately, speaking of brands, here’s an article about Nike’s “plan to hold down its turf with women.” The article contains an egregious error, stating that Flyknit caused Nike’s net income to spike 40% in the 3 months after it was released, when of course Flyknit was a factor, but not the sole one. I, therefore, take the entire article with a grain of salt, but still think it’s worth reading, as it details some of unprecedented challenges that the brand faces, and also discusses the company’s market research efforts, a far cry from the company’s longtime policy of telling consumers what they want, rather than asking them.
Faye Landes, co-founder and general partner of Back to the Future Ventures, advises emerging consumer and retail companies on strategy, branding and fundraising. She was one of Wall Street’s leading consumer and retail analysts for over 20 years and was widely recognized for her ability to anticipate sweeping trends, such as the widespread adoption of activewear. She has frequently appeared on CNBC, Bloomberg TV and other media outlets and has presented at industry conferences all over the world. Read her “Analyst’s Take” column here weekly. Contact her at email@example.com.
LevaData is tapping the power of AI to make strategic sourcing and procurement more seamless for apparel industry members.Read more
Samples, it seems, may soon end up on the endangered list if 3D modeling technology continues to improve and provides the industry with a way to cut down production timelines.Read more
Abercrombie & Fitch continues to rely on Hollister gains, while positioning the Abercrombie brand for similar success. Gap sales up on Athleta, Old Navy performance.Read more
The domestic textile industry and apparel importers have often been on opposite sides of U.S. trade issues, but in today’s political climate they seem to have found some common ground.Read more
U.S. employers added 261,000 jobs in October, pushing unemployment down to the lowest rate since the halcyon days of late 2000.Read more
While everyone’s been focused on the "retail apocalypse," the real story to emerge from 2017 might be the strange bedfellows that have emerged as everyone tries to plot a course forward. The recent partnership between Walmart and Lord & Taylor is the latest to get people talking.Read more
J.W. Anderson’s chief executive, Simon Whitehouse, is exiting the company, plus Dick's Sporting Goods tapped Paul Gaffney as its new CTO.Read more