The Amazon/Whole Foods marriage may not be a done deal.
Though it sent shockwaves through the retail community when it was announced last month, the acquisition must still be approved by shareholders and the government—and now both parties are threatening to throw up roadblocks.
Congressman David Cicilline of Rhode Island has called for a hearing to review the $13.7 billion deal. Cicilline, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee, is concerned that the deal will cause decreased competition, and as a result, costs could rise while wages fall.
“Amazon’s proposed purchase of Whole Foods could impact neighborhood grocery stores and hardworking consumers across America,” Cicilline said in a statement. “Congress has a responsibility to fully scrutinize this merger before it goes ahead.”
Among his concerns is that Amazon’s tech dominance will mean Whole Foods stores will be automated, costing jobs. Cicilline likens the possible effects of this deal to the way in which Walmart “destroyed small businesses.”
[Read about what others speculate the Amazon/Whole Foods deal might mean: Amazon & Whole Foods: What’s Next for Retail?]
The news out of Washington is already having an effect on the e-commerce giant. Owing to concerns like these plus the fact that Amazon’s owner, Jeff Bezos, also owns The Washington Post, a mainstream newspaper that is often critical of President Trump, Douglas Kass, head of Seabreeze Partners Management, is preparing for the government to take steps against the deal.
“I am shorting Amazon today because I have learned that there are currently early discussions and due diligence being considered in the legislative chambers in Washington, D.C.,” Kass wrote in a note to investors, according to Reuters. “If I am correct, word of this could lower Amazon’s shares by 10 percent overnight.”
In addition to the Congressman’s concerns, some Whole Foods shareholders are starting to grumble—and worse.
Shareholder Robert Riegel has filed suit in which he says that Whole Foods is withholding information and doesn’t explain the valuation claims.
“The proxy statement states that, in connection with negotiating the merger agreement, Amazon had preliminary discussions with certain Whole Foods executive officers regarding Amazon’s desire to retain such officers following the closing” the suit says, according to the Austin-American Statesman. “However, the proxy fails to disclose the timing and nature of all communications regarding the future employment and/or benefits relating to Whole Foods management.”
Riegel is seeking class action status for the suit.
LevaData is tapping the power of AI to make strategic sourcing and procurement more seamless for apparel industry members.Read more
Samples, it seems, may soon end up on the endangered list if 3D modeling technology continues to improve and provides the industry with a way to cut down production timelines.Read more
Abercrombie & Fitch continues to rely on Hollister gains, while positioning the Abercrombie brand for similar success. Gap sales up on Athleta, Old Navy performance.Read more
The domestic textile industry and apparel importers have often been on opposite sides of U.S. trade issues, but in today’s political climate they seem to have found some common ground.Read more
U.S. employers added 261,000 jobs in October, pushing unemployment down to the lowest rate since the halcyon days of late 2000.Read more
While everyone’s been focused on the "retail apocalypse," the real story to emerge from 2017 might be the strange bedfellows that have emerged as everyone tries to plot a course forward. The recent partnership between Walmart and Lord & Taylor is the latest to get people talking.Read more
J.W. Anderson’s chief executive, Simon Whitehouse, is exiting the company, plus Dick's Sporting Goods tapped Paul Gaffney as its new CTO.Read more